LINKS
ARCHIVE
You are not logged in. Log in
Entries by Topic
All topics  «
Political
Wed, 13 Sep 2006
King Josiah would have stamped out the evil Pres Bush is pursuing



Pres. Bush announced the offensive to pursue EVIL after the 9/11 attack without identifying Islam as being the common denominator in world terrorism. Now "fundamentalist" Islam is blamed, not Islam itself, so as not to offend Islamic oil producers. In fact, even Islamic regimes are endangered by Islamic extremists and they try to uproot them as well. It is a waste of time though, since there will always be muftis around who would lead their followers to execute exactly what the Koran is really about, namely the honor of martyrdom, conquering the world by force and to terrorize infidels.


The problem therefore lies with Islam itself due to the bloodthirstiness of its god, Allah. The only way to deal with it is to uproot it by destroying its religious objects, like Josiah did, followed by leading the people to serve the God who can really save and preserve them.
Now Josiah also took away all the shrines of the high places that were in the cities of Samaria, which the kings of Israel had made to provoke the LORD to anger; 2 Kings 23:19 NKJV
Thus Josiah removed all the abominations from all the country that belonged to the children of Israel, and made all who were present in Israel diligently serve the LORD their God. 2 Chron 34:33 NKJV
"Their God," who identified himself to Moses as "I Am," took Abram's family out of Babylon, Satan's stronghold and therefore the birthplace of all Satanic idle worshiping "mystery" religions, to form a new nation for himself, the Hebrews, in Canaan. However, as in the days of the kings of Israel, the gods of Babylon have been trying to establish themselves in Israel and the rest of the world, as we now have with Allah and his phallic towers (minarets - just another version of Babylonian obelisks) and domed roof structures, typical of a fertility gods, plus moon symbols since Allah is a moon god.

The power of Islam in Israel lies in its control of Israel's God's Temple Mount. That enables him to have mosques there, of which the Dome of the Rock, that is central in the logos of most Islamic organizations in Israel - associated with swords and guns to reflect the inherent violence in Islam.

It is definitely a spiritual principle in Israel that the party that controls the Temple Mount basically controls the land and has legitimate rights in the land. Destruction of their source of power and legitimacy will therefore immediately deligitimize Allah's people's claims of rights and land ownership. If they are altogether banned from the Temple Mount, unless they go up there to honor Israel's God, as is expected from foreigners in the land, they would not even have a reason to be in the land. Not having this trophy in Israel will discredit Allah and cause his people to rethink their traditional adherence to him without questioning his bloodthirstiness and the validity of his claims and commands.

In his incitement of the Arabs, Yaser Arafat came up with the slogan, "A million martyrs marching to Jerusalem!" This will actually follow, accompanied by a lot of shooting, should the mosques on the Temple Mount be damaged or destroyed and the Jews are held responsible and/or refuse to allow them to restore their mosques. Neighboring Moslem nations will probably also join in, but the damage to Allah's reputation will cause them all not to be unquestioning martyrs for him anymore. All that would then be needed to neutralize Allah completely would be a nuclear attack on the Kabah in Mecca that would prevent pilgrimages until they don't matter anymore.

Why not do it, in view of the fact that it will basically bring an end to terrorism in the world and that this sort of delegitimizing is exactly what Satan is trying to do to the God of Israel? All he needs to do is to take Israel's land from them, that he had promised would be theirs for eternity. or eradicate the Jews to prove that he couldn't preserve them as a nation eternally as he'd said he would.

remote Posted by Editor at 12:09 PM
Post Comment | Permalink

View Latest Entries